| Observations on Juvenile Detention Public opinion in Bahrain was recently preoccupied with the issue 
				of the detention of a number of children below 18-year on security 
				grounds. The exact number of those detained and accused of unlicensed 
				assembly, the possession of fire arms and Molotov cocktails is unknown. 
				The number of detained children was discussed by newspapers and 
				MPs, which according to some estimates could be as low as 65 or 
				as high as 85. The Juvenile Public Prosecutor, Noora Al Khalifa 
				rejected these figures by saying that they were inaccurate, unverified 
				and could mislead the public. However, she did not give the exact 
				number.  A number of factors brought this issue to light. It is obvious 
				that such children were involved in rioting and hence the following 
				objections are not directed at the nature of the charges but rather 
				on other issues, which include:  Objections directed at the manner in which they were detained 
				as it violated the law, because their place of detention was unknown 
				for days. The Government said that some were detained because of 
				their participation in riots.  There are also objections over time span of the detention. The 
				children spent several months in detention before being put on trial. 
				According to some reports, some of the children should have been 
				released immediately after the end of the investigation, until the 
				commencement of the trial.  It is alleged that the detainees were held in adult detention 
				centres and prisons. The Government denied this allegation or at 
				least denied some specific cases. Brigadier Mohammad Bomahmood from 
				the Ministry of Interior dismissed the claims and said that they 
				were kept in Juvenile care centres. These centres are under the 
				supervision of the Ministry of Social Development, which provides 
				suitable educational programs.  There were some criticisms directed at the Government for its 
				failure to comply with the International Convention on The Rights 
				of The Child, which it ratified in February 1992 and came into force 
				in March 1992. For example, the Government prevented children from 
				sitting their final exams, despite parents’ persistence. Noora Al 
				Khalifa believes that “the legislative and executive policies in 
				the Kingdom regarding children conform with international laws and 
				conventions. The procedures of the Public Prosecutor also conform 
				with these laws.”  Human rights activists also criticized the Government for its 
				lack of transparency in providing basic information to the guardians 
				of the children. Also, Government legal procedures were very slow 
				causing psychological and physical pressure to the detained children.
				 Cases involving juveniles are very sensitive and hence need to 
				be dealt with in a professional, accurate and fast manner. The human 
				side of these cases should be taken into consideration. We understand 
				that extremists incite children into violence in order to achieve 
				their political goals. We also understand that parents of those 
				children are not fulfilling their duties in guiding and caring for 
				their children. We also understand that any shortcomings in this 
				regard could have grave consequences.  |